首页> 外文OA文献 >Extracorporeal Life Support as a Bridge to Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience With an Emphasis on Health-Related Quality of Life
【2h】

Extracorporeal Life Support as a Bridge to Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience With an Emphasis on Health-Related Quality of Life

机译:体外生命支持,通向肺移植:单中心体验,重点是健康相关的生活质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to lung transplantation is increasingly used, but information on long-term outcome is scarce. We aim to summarize our experience with an emphasis on health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes include ICU and hospital stay and pre-and post-transplant mortality. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all adult subjects receiving ECLS as a bridge to lung transplantation from 2010 to 2014 was reviewed and compared with all adult subjects who underwent bilateral lung transplantation in the same period. For the ECLS group, the general health status was assessed with the use of the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 130 bilateral transplants were performed, 9 transplants were performed after ECLS therapy. Another 11 subjects died on the waiting list while receiving ECLS. Quality of life, at 12 months after surgery, from a subject's perspective was comparable in both groups with a median score of 80 on the visual analog scale. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire 3L score from the societal perspective in the ECLS group was 0.73 (0.5-0.9). Median (IQR) ICU stay was 25 d (9-68 d) for the ECLS group versus 7 d (4-18 d) for the control group (P = .001), and in-hospital stay was 66 d (40-114 d) versus 42 d (29-62 d) (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: ECLS can be used as a bridge to lung transplantation. A significant number of subjects were not bridged successfully due to different reasons. Outcomes after successful transplantation after ECLS might be comparable with the general population undergoing lung transplantation in terms of quality of life, lung function, performance tests, and mortality, although ICU and hospital stay are longer.
机译:背景:体外生命支持(ECLS)作为肺移植的桥梁越来越多地被使用,但是关于长期结果的信息却很少。我们旨在总结我们的经验,重点是健康相关的生活质量。次要结果包括ICU和住院时间以及移植前后的死亡率。方法:回顾性队列研究了2010年至2014年接受ECLS作为肺移植桥梁的所有成年受试者,并将其与同期进行双侧肺移植的所有成年受试者进行了比较。对于ECLS组,使用EuroQol组5维自我报告调查表对总体健康状况进行了评估。结果:共进行了130例双侧移植,ECLS治疗后进行了9例移植。另有11名受试者在接受ECLS时在等待名单上死亡。从受试者的角度来看,两组患者术后12个月的生活质量在视觉模拟量表中均达到80分。从社会角度来看,ECLS组中EuroQol组5维自我报告调查问卷3L的中位数(四分位数范围[IQR])为0.73(0.5-0.9)。 ECLS组的ICU中位停留时间为25 d(9-68 d),而对照组为7 d(4-18 d)(P = .001),住院时间为66 d(40- 114 d)与42 d(29-62 d)(P = .004)。结论:ECLS可作为通向肺移植的桥梁。由于不同的原因,很多受试者未能成功衔接。尽管ICU和住院时间更长,但在生活质量,肺功能,性能测试和死亡率方面,ECLS成功移植后的结局可能与接受肺移植的普通人群相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号